


but it could be interesting to make this kind of comparison.
#Autoplay in hiarcs chess explorer how to
is it a better analysis tool than his well-known rivals (Deep Fritz, Shredder, Junior, Hiarcs.) ?Ī thread about chess engines could be interesting : How to use chess engines in correspondence chess, which ones (when & why), their weaknesses.įor sure many players don't want to tell their opponents their way of 'think' :). Its funny to see, that an Engine (Rybka,Fritz etc.) dont understand the ideas behind this defense and without an opening-book, engines dont see that 6.e4! is the only way, to get an advantage.Īre there correspondence chess players who use Rybka here ?. I can say, i know all variations about this opening and this thematic tournament will be my first tourney here, where i will not use computer-assistence. 6.e4! is the best move, but many many players don't know it and the possibility for black, to get a good result in a game is very high. Last time i've saw this Defense at the Chess-Olympic, played by players around 2400-2500. The Dzindzi-Indian-Defense is an easy to learn opening and i've got good results with it in many tourneys. Sergey played 6.h4?! and after 15 moves, we draw the game. I've played last year in Litomysl in a Simultan versus GM Sergey Movsesian this "Dzindzi-Indian-Defense". The move 5.f5 was played to prevent black of 6.e4, but 6.e4! is the best move, white can play. There are many interesting lines and some of them, transpose the game to other openings (Pirc, Sicilian-Dragon, Kings-Indian etc.). Roman Dzindzihasvili is the founder of this Defense and i think, "Beefeater" is not the right name. The point of this opening is, to have with the black color good knights versus a bad bishop-pair of white. All other lines are really bad for white. The e4-Line is the only line, which gives white the possibility of an clear advantage. It had been said that Chess 960 would replace Chess too. if there are sentient beings on other planets, then they play go." (Emanuel Lasker, chess world champion) "I really believe that Go is destined to take the place of Chess as the leading intellectual game of the Occident, just as it has reigned supreme in the Orient for some four thousand years." (Edward Lasker, international chess master) ICCF correspondence chess world championship 'chancy', a statistical happening, or is there a place yet for human play in modern correspondence chess ? Is the extraordinary performance by Christophe Léotard at XIX th. :)Īre draws and chess engines killing chess game, are the level and play simply standardized by Deep Fritz and Rybka. You may have noticed this "grave" question on the home page.
